Course Hub
The focus of this one-day course will be on explaining elements of a sample real-life Crisis Emergency Response Plan. Practical tools and industrial examples will be presented.
0
0
0
What’s included?
Course Facilitators
Upcoming Sessions
There are no upcoming courses at this time, please contact us for more information.
Customized Courses
While BakerRisk offers a range of pre-packaged courses, we recognize that the most effective courses incorporate your company’s specific hazards, incidents, and lessons learned. Please contact us to discuss how we can custom-tailor courses to fit your company’s needs. Your course may include:
Courses may be offered at your site or a BakerRisk location, depending on the course or your needs.
We’ll walk through your facility to customize courses to suit and include an assessment.
Utilize demonstrations to give a first-hand feel of hazards through simulations.
Case studies using real scenarios, including role play, so participants can apply their new training.
Related Resources
There are risks associated with honey lab explosions. Therefore, it's important that anyone involved in the cannabis industry learns these risks.
Fire hazard protection is often reduced by harmful myths. Discover the truth of 10 fire hazard myths solved with fire hazard analysis in this breakdown.
We are pleased to sponsor, exhibit, and present at the 2021 Hazards31 conference!
This document provides field tested suggestions and best practices to help bridge the gap between the standards and fire hazard studies.
BakerRisk’s FHMA methodology uses a scenario-based approach to manage fire hazards at your facility.
This paper presents a methodology for conducting damage mechanism reviews (DMRs) that can help operating companies maintain equipment integrity by providing a foundational basis on which to manage and mitigate common damage mechanisms that may effect plant equipment. The DMR methodology allows ammonia-related industries to draw on recent API recommended practices to provide a holistic management resource for the plant’s Mechanical Integrity Process Safety Management programs. The assessment methodology is demonstrated for typical process unit equipment in an ammonia plant. BakerRisk’s Asset Mechanical Integrity Plan identifies the potential damage mechanisms based on known process parameters, selects the appropriate inspection methods, and communicates relevant factors and possible mitigation options as a resource for the site.
“Fire Hazard Analysis” (FHA) is referenced in a number of industry standards, practices, and guidance documents and is often the key first-step to understanding potential fire exposure scenarios and developing a plan to manage those exposures.
BakerRisk recently teamed with the NFPA’s Fire Protection Research Foundation (FPRF) to conduct a test program to determine the adequacy of deluge as a means of vapor mitigation.
Processing facilities require a reliable supply of electrical power. The consequences of a sudden power loss ranges from an inconvenience to a major incident with consequences including damage to equipment, failure of emergency systems, loss of containment, fires, explosions and environmental impact. Damage during restart can also be a major issue.
Worldwide, industry standards and best practices require personnel risk to be calculated and reviewed for existing and new petrochemical facilities. One way of addressing personnel risk is via a thorough Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA), which identifies populations who may incur high risk as a result of working at the facility. Subsequent risk reduction may include relocation of personnel or providing better protection (i.e., new buildings or building upgrades). However, a QRA can also identify the “high risk process loops” (HRPLs), which are those areas of the process contributing the most risk to onsite and offsite personnel.
In addition to structural components, a building’s infrastructure is also vulnerable to the effects of an internal or external explosion. A series of recent tests were performed using a shock tube in which a blast load was applied to a masonry wall to approximate the debris field produced by an explosion. The debris was then allowed to impact a number of test articles consisting of water-filled and pressurized pipe specimens. The specimens included two diameters of steel piping and one of copper piping. One set of specimens was air-backed and supported only at the top and bottom, while the other set was mounted against a rigid wall.
Contact: +1 (210) 824-5960
