Conference Papers
This paper discusses several modeling issues for consideration when using a finite element analysis (FEA) approach to represent crimped metal wall panels responding to blast loads. Two profiles of crimped metal wall panels are modeled using two commercially-available FEA codes, namely ADINA and LS-DYNA. The first panel is ¼-inch thick with 4-inch deep corrugations and is supported by six-inch steel tubing eave struts at each end. The second panel is 0.078 inches thick with 1½-inch deep corrugations. Special connections are used at the end supports that are designed to deform and absorb energy during the structural response, preventing premature tearing of the panel. These panels are modeled using both FEA codes for a high-explosive blast load. The second panel was also tested using the BakerRisk shock tube. The FEA results are compared to observations from the tests.
Mr. Edel is a member of BakerRisk’s Protective Structures Group. His work focuses on impulsive and conventional loading of structures for industrial and government applications. This has primarily included analysis and design of new and existing buildings, blast-resistant upgrade designs, hazard containment enclosures, and federal building and airport evaluations and site planning. He has performed siting studies for various petrochemical plants to determine the response of structural components and systems to blast loads.
As the biofuels industry continues to expand in support of global decarbonization mandates and objectives, facility owners and developers are being challenged to balance production efficiency, operational reliability, and personnel safety.
As high hazard facilities, biofuels sites should focus on developing a fire protections strategy informed by performance-based analysis so strategies implemented meet the unique challenges found at each facility.