Conference Papers
For Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) scenarios involving overpressure of equipment, pressure relief systems are often given significant Independent Protection Layer (IPL) credit, and in most cases this is appropriate. However, LOPA teams need to be aware of the many factors of design, installation, and maintenance of these systems that must be properly addressed in order for this IPL credit to be valid. These factors are represented in the context of generic IPL criteria of Independence, Functionality, Integrity, Reliability, Auditability, and Management of Change. Additionally, appropriate IPL credit for multiple relief devices and the use of rupture disks in combination with pressure relief valves is defined, and best practices are presented for developing recommendations that most effectively address identified LOPA gaps.
Mr. Drennen is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work focuses on Process Safety Management (PSM) Consulting Services, including Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) facilitation (for both existing processes and capital projects), Sizing calculations and hydraulic studies for pressure relief devices and relief headers, Detailed dispersion modeling of pressure relief system discharges to the atmosphere using Safesite3G©, Development of guidelines and work processes for relief system design and analysis, Safety Integrity Level (SIL) determination, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), and PSM Compliance Audits, serving the Oil & Gas, Chemical, Agricultural, and Energy industries.
For his PHA and LOPA facilitation work, he has utilized various methodologies including Hazards and Operability (HAZOP), What-If, Structured What-If (SWIF), Hazard Identification (HAZID), and Checklist techniques to evaluate hazardous process operations, new equipment designs, and process modifications, using PHA Pro, PHAWorks, Leader, and PHA-Tool© documentation software.
As the biofuels industry continues to expand in support of global decarbonization mandates and objectives, facility owners and developers are being challenged to balance production efficiency, operational reliability, and personnel safety.
As high hazard facilities, biofuels sites should focus on developing a fire protections strategy informed by performance-based analysis so strategies implemented meet the unique challenges found at each facility.