Conference Papers
Fixed water spray systems may be designed to mitigate flammable vapors. They work primarily by entraining air into the spray cone and mixing the air and water droplets with the flammable vapor, thereby diluting the vapor. The current industry standards – including NFPA 15: Standard for water spray fixed systems for fire protection, while providing information on vapor mitigation using fixed water spray (section 7.5) – do not provide the design criteria on how much water and pressure is required to effectively mitigate a specified minor vapor leak. API 2030 does not address the use of fixed water spray for vapor mitigation. In addition, in the event of an ignition, the amount of water and pressure required to control the fire is not defined. This has resulted in the inconsistent application of NFPA 15 for vapor mitigation by engineers and consultants.
The goal of this research project is to evaluate the effectiveness of fixed water sprays to suppress the development of flammable vapor clouds and control the fire in case of ignition.
Mr. Gandhi is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. He is a Process Safety Engineer with over 19 years of experience in controls and safety systems and over 12 years of experience in qualitative hazard and risk analysis. Mr. Gandhi manages Fire and Gas Systems (FGS) and Hazardous Area Classification (HAC) services at BakerRisk, where he has reviewed boilers and heater Burner Management Systems (BMS) to NFPA85 and NFPA86 standards.
Since 2020, he has led the Low Carbon Energy Risk Management group at BakerRisk which comprises of hydrogen and hydrogen carriers, biofuels, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) sub-groups. He has been a continuous member and leader of ISA at the student, local, and national levels since 2001 and the Hydrogen Technology Committee at CGA. He is the primary committee member for NFPA 715 Gas Detection Standard and is a contributing author on ISA TR84.00.07 Fire and Gas Detection and TR84.00.05 Burner Management System.
Mr. Fergusson is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work is primarily focused on insurance risk engineering, Facility Siting Studies (FSS), and Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRA) for refineries and chemical facilities where he has gained experience in loss prevention surveys, as well as consequence and risk modeling of blast, toxic, fire, and flammable hazards.
Dr. Zhao is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. Her work focuses on the consequence modeling of toxic releases and vapor cloud explosions. She has performed numerous facility siting studies, consequence analysis, and quantitative risk analysis studies at gas plants and petrochemical facilities, as well as in the fertilizer industry. Dr. Zhao’s experience also incorporates Safety Instrumented System (SIS) design basis development and verification/validation projects. She has performed as facilitator and scribe on numerous Safety Integrity Level (SIL) assignments and performed quantitative reliability analysis to verify achievement of SIL targets calculations.
As the biofuels industry continues to expand in support of global decarbonization mandates and objectives, facility owners and developers are being challenged to balance production efficiency, operational reliability, and personnel safety.
As high hazard facilities, biofuels sites should focus on developing a fire protections strategy informed by performance-based analysis so strategies implemented meet the unique challenges found at each facility.