Mr. Moosemiller is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work focuses on Process Safety and Risk and Reliability Assessment, with 35 years of experience in the following areas: Facility Siting Analyses (FSS), Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), Process Hazards Analysis (PHA), Reliability/Availability Assessment, Risk-Based Inspection, and auditing of management systems and field installations. He was previously part of teams that commissioned new oil refinery process units worldwide.
Mr. Gandhi is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. He is a Process Safety Engineer with over 19 years of experience in controls and safety systems and over 12 years of experience in qualitative hazard and risk analysis. Mr. Gandhi manages Fire and Gas Systems (FGS) and Hazardous Area Classification (HAC) services at BakerRisk, where he has reviewed boilers and heater Burner Management Systems (BMS) to NFPA85 and NFPA86 standards.
Since 2020, he has led the Low Carbon Energy Risk Management group at BakerRisk which comprises of hydrogen and hydrogen carriers, biofuels, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) sub-groups. He has been a continuous member and leader of ISA at the student, local, and national levels since 2001 and the Hydrogen Technology Committee at CGA. He is the primary committee member for NFPA 715 Gas Detection Standard and is a contributing author on ISA TR84.00.07 Fire and Gas Detection and TR84.00.05 Burner Management System.
Mr. Parsons is a member of the BakerRisk’s Blast Effects Group. His work focuses on performing siting studies and explosion hazard analysis projects in which he has predicted internal and external blast loads from deflagrations and detonations. He has performed over 250 Dust Hazard Analyses (DHA) as well as numerous incident investigations across a wide range of industries all over the world.
Mr. Parsons serves on the NFPA 654 Committee “Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids”, “NFPA 61 Committee” Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities,” as well as on the NFPA 652 Committee “Standard on the Fundamentals of Combustible Dust”.
Mr. Fergusson is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work is primarily focused on insurance risk engineering, Facility Siting Studies (FSS), and Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRA) for refineries and chemical facilities where he has gained experience in loss prevention surveys, as well as consequence and risk modeling of blast, toxic, fire, and flammable hazards.
Ms. Kalmbach is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. Her work is focused on supporting Facility Siting Studies and Quantitative Risk Analyses.
In previous articles in this series, BakerRisk discussed the hydrogen economy and high-level hazards. Additionally, best practices and general guidance for performing a PHA on hydrogen processing facilities to accurately assess all the risks and consequences associated with hydrogen were also covered. This article will focus on the materials and potential damage mechanisms and hazards associated with the operation of equipment exposed to hydrogen, including pressure vessels, pipelines, piping, and other equipment handling hydrogen.
Hydrogen has been used in petroleum refining, fertilizer production, chemical synthesis and many more applications for centuries. Throughout hydrogen’s use, releases have resulted in numerous explosion and fire incidents. Hydrogen is becoming more prevalent as a low carbon energy solution since it can be used both as an energy carrier as well as a replacement for raw materials. As hydrogen is adopted across more industries and applications, continued emphasis on preventing release and escalation is essential.
Test programs, such as those discussed above, have provided significant validation of the current methodologies used to analyze hydrogen hazards. Despite the enormous amount of work done by BakerRisk, the ERC, and others to understand the hazards associated with hydrogen, there is still more work to be done.
As the biofuels industry continues to expand in support of global decarbonization mandates and objectives, facility owners and developers are being challenged to balance production efficiency, operational reliability, and personnel safety.
The promise of hydrogen as the simplest of molecules and perhaps the most challenging and perplexing of energy carriers has the clean energy world diving into hydrogen applications across all major energy categories.