White Papers
Previously, we have discussed the importance of managing hydrogen safety hazards through Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) and understanding damage mechanisms on materials and equipment that are exposed to hydrogen. This paper will cover another aspect of hydrogen safety, from the perspective of consequence modeling and risk management.
Hydrogen electrolyzer facilities and liquefaction infrastructure pose unique safety challenges compared to traditional gasoline production. This does not mean that hydrogen as fuel is “riskier” than other fuels, but rather that a focus on safe handling and operation is key to developing this infrastructure safely and successfully. Facility Siting Studies (FSSs) and Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRAs) are powerful tools used to quantitatively assess consequences and risks from credible loss of containment scenarios resulting in explosion, fire, or toxic events, to onsite personnel and/or offsite population. Such assessments are used to objectively evaluate the hazards present within hydrogen facilities and to provide guidance and prioritization methods for mitigation measures that will be most effective in reducing onsite and offsite consequences and risks to tolerable levels.
Mr. Bruce-Black is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work focuses on performing and managing Facility Siting Studies (FSS), Quantitative Risk Assessments (QRA), Business Interruption Studies, Audits, Process Hazard Analyses (PHA), and Hazardous Area Classification Studies (HAC) for leading U.S. petrochemical and chemical companies. He has provided FSS/QRA and risk mitigation training to organizations, conferences, and for clients as part of the BakerRisk Learning Center. He also has extensive experience with the development of FSS/QRA Procedures/Guidelines and consequence/risk tolerance criteria and has identified and evaluated cost-effective risk mitigation measures to allow companies to make informed risk management decisions.
Mr. Moosemiller is a member of BakerRisk’s Process Safety Group. His work focuses on Process Safety and Risk and Reliability Assessment, with 35 years of experience in the following areas: Facility Siting Analyses (FSS), Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), Process Hazards Analysis (PHA), Reliability/Availability Assessment, Risk-Based Inspection, and auditing of management systems and field installations. He was previously part of teams that commissioned new oil refinery process units worldwide.
In 2023, BakerRisk published a series of white papers on hydrogen safety, reviewing diverse perspectives on managing hazards and associated risks due to the presence of hydrogen, and utilizing various tools, techniques, and analyses. As hydrogen continues to emerge and re-emerge as a key technology and economy player, it is essential to understand how to effectively control hydrogen associated hazards and risks to minimize impacts on both people and assets. The first paper in this updated series covers the concept of hydrogen safety from the facility siting perspective.
In previous articles in this series, BakerRisk discussed the hydrogen economy and high-level hazards. Additionally, best practices and general guidance for performing a PHA on hydrogen processing facilities to accurately assess all the risks and consequences associated with hydrogen were also covered. This article will focus on the materials and potential damage mechanisms and hazards associated with the operation of equipment exposed to hydrogen, including pressure vessels, pipelines, piping, and other equipment handling hydrogen.
Hydrogen has been used in petroleum refining, fertilizer production, chemical synthesis and many more applications for centuries. Throughout hydrogen’s use, releases have resulted in numerous explosion and fire incidents. Hydrogen is becoming more prevalent as a low carbon energy solution since it can be used both as an energy carrier as well as a replacement for raw materials. As hydrogen is adopted across more industries and applications, continued emphasis on preventing release and escalation is essential.
Test programs, such as those discussed above, have provided significant validation of the current methodologies used to analyze hydrogen hazards. Despite the enormous amount of work done by BakerRisk, the ERC, and others to understand the hazards associated with hydrogen, there is still more work to be done.
As the biofuels industry continues to expand in support of global decarbonization mandates and objectives, facility owners and developers are being challenged to balance production efficiency, operational reliability, and personnel safety.